Introduction[edit]
These are the results for the 2008 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and Tracking task. For background information about this task set please refer to the 2013:Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation & Tracking page.
General Legend[edit]
Task 1: Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)[edit]
MF0E Overall Summary Results[edit]
Below are the average scores across 40 test files. These files come from 3 different sources: woodwind quintet recording of bassoon, clarinet, horn,flute and oboe (UIUC); Rendered MIDI using RWC database donated by IRCAM and a quartet recording of bassoon, clarinet, violin and sax donated by Dr. Bryan Pardo`s Interactive Audio Lab (IAL). 20 files coming from 5 sections of the woodwind recording where each section has 4 files ranging from 2 polyphony to 5 polyphony. 12 files from IAL, coming from 4 different songs ranging from 2 polyphony to 4 polyphony and 8 files from RWC synthesized midi ranging from 2 different songs ranging from 2 polphony to 5 polyphony.
|
BW1 |
CDM1 |
CDM2 |
| Accuracy |
0.662 |
0.620 |
0.620 |
| Accuracy Chroma |
0.694 |
0.660 |
0.660 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Results[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Accuracy |
Etot |
Esubs |
Emiss |
Efa |
|
| BW1 |
0.771 |
0.735 |
0.662 |
0.392 |
0.112 |
0.153 |
0.128 |
| CDM1 |
0.741 |
0.694 |
0.620 |
0.443 |
0.128 |
0.178 |
0.137 |
| CDM2 |
0.741 |
0.694 |
0.620 |
0.443 |
0.128 |
0.178 |
0.137 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Chroma Results[edit]
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
|
Precision |
Recall |
Accuracy |
Etot |
Esubs |
Emiss |
Efa |
|
| BW1 |
0.808 |
0.774 |
0.694 |
0.354 |
0.073 |
0.153 |
0.128 |
| CDM1 |
0.789 |
0.742 |
0.660 |
0.395 |
0.080 |
0.178 |
0.137 |
| CDM2 |
0.789 |
0.742 |
0.660 |
0.395 |
0.080 |
0.178 |
0.137 |
download these results as csv
Individual Results Files for Task 1[edit]
BW1= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
CDM1= Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch
CDM2= Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch
Info about the filenames[edit]
The filenames starting with part* comes from acoustic woodwind recording, the ones starting with RWC are synthesized. The legend about the instruments are:
bs = bassoon,
cl = clarinet,
fl = flute,
hn = horn,
ob = oboe,
vl = violin,
cel = cello,
gtr = guitar,
sax = saxophone,
bass = electric bass guitar
Run Times[edit]
| sub_ID |
Runtime(sec) |
| BW1 |
3374 |
| CDM1 |
62027 |
| CDM2 |
61992 |
download these results as csv
Friedman tests for Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)[edit]
The Friedman test was run in MATLAB to test significant differences amongst systems with regard to the performance (accuracy) on individual files.
Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison[edit]
| TeamID |
TeamID |
Lowerbound |
Mean |
Upperbound |
Significance |
| BW1 |
CDM2 |
0.8211 |
1.2750 |
1.7289 |
TRUE |
| BW1 |
CDM1 |
0.8211 |
1.2750 |
1.7289 |
TRUE |
| CDM2 |
CDM1 |
-0.4539 |
0.0000 |
0.4539 |
FALSE |
download these results as csv
Task 2:Note Tracking (NT)[edit]
NT Mixed Set Overall Summary Results[edit]
This subtask is evaluated in two different ways. In the first setup , a returned note is assumed correct if its onset is within +-50ms of a ref note and its F0 is within +- quarter tone of the corresponding reference note, ignoring the returned offset values. In the second setup, on top of the above requirements, a correct returned note is required to have an offset value within 20% of the ref notes duration around the ref note`s offset, or within 50ms whichever is larger.
A total of 34 files were used in this subtask: 16 from woodwind recording, 8 from IAL quintet recording and 6 piano.
|
BW2 |
BW3 |
CDM3 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset-Offset |
0.3264 |
0.2745 |
0.2880 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset Only |
0.5533 |
0.4754 |
0.5071 |
| Ave. F-Measure Chroma |
0.3383 |
0.3142 |
0.3058 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset Only Chroma |
0.5751 |
0.5512 |
0.5439 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Results[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.335 |
0.334 |
0.326 |
0.879 |
| BW3 |
0.237 |
0.342 |
0.274 |
0.879 |
| CDM3 |
0.268 |
0.328 |
0.288 |
0.857 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Chroma Results[edit]
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.347 |
0.347 |
0.338 |
0.875 |
| BW3 |
0.270 |
0.395 |
0.314 |
0.877 |
| CDM3 |
0.283 |
0.350 |
0.306 |
0.854 |
download these results as csv
Results Based on Onset Only[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.592 |
0.546 |
0.553 |
0.726 |
| BW3 |
0.419 |
0.576 |
0.475 |
0.720 |
| CDM3 |
0.479 |
0.562 |
0.507 |
0.702 |
download these results as csv
Chroma Results Based on Onset Only[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.615 |
0.570 |
0.575 |
0.712 |
| BW3 |
0.483 |
0.675 |
0.551 |
0.684 |
| CDM3 |
0.513 |
0.606 |
0.544 |
0.682 |
download these results as csv
Run Times[edit]
| sub_ID |
Runtime(sec) |
| BW2 |
3706 |
| BW3 |
2203 |
| CDM3 |
68470 |
download these results as csv
Friedman Tests for Note Tracking[edit]
The Friedman test was run in MATLAB to test significant differences amongst systems with regard to the F-measure on individual files.
Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison for Task2[edit]
| TeamID |
TeamID |
Lowerbound |
Mean |
Upperbound |
Significance |
| BW2 |
CDM3 |
0.0786 |
0.6471 |
1.2155 |
TRUE |
| BW2 |
BW3 |
0.2845 |
0.8529 |
1.4214 |
TRUE |
| CDM3 |
BW3 |
-0.3625 |
0.2059 |
0.7743 |
FALSE |
download these results as csv
NT Piano-Only Overall Summary Results[edit]
This subtask is evaluated in two different ways. In the first setup , a returned note is assumed correct if its onset is within +-50ms of a ref note and its F0 is within +- quarter tone of the corresponding reference note, ignoring the returned offset values. In the second setup, on top of the above requirements, a correct returned note is required to have an offset value within 20% of the ref notes duration around the ref note`s offset, or within 50ms whichever is larger.
6 piano recordings are evaluated separately for this subtask.
|
BW2 |
BW3 |
CDM3 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset-Offset |
0.1596 |
0.1940 |
0.1551 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset Only |
0.5359 |
0.6110 |
0.5723 |
| Ave. F-Measure Chroma |
0.1653 |
0.2055 |
0.1692 |
| Ave. F-Measure Onset Only Chroma |
0.5455 |
0.6274 |
0.5904 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Results[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.186 |
0.141 |
0.160 |
0.831 |
| BW3 |
0.193 |
0.195 |
0.194 |
0.831 |
| CDM3 |
0.158 |
0.153 |
0.155 |
0.788 |
download these results as csv
Detailed Chroma Results[edit]
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.192 |
0.146 |
0.165 |
0.824 |
| BW3 |
0.205 |
0.207 |
0.205 |
0.819 |
| CDM3 |
0.172 |
0.167 |
0.169 |
0.780 |
download these results as csv
Results Based on Onset Only[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.610 |
0.483 |
0.536 |
0.559 |
| BW3 |
0.608 |
0.616 |
0.611 |
0.562 |
| CDM3 |
0.575 |
0.574 |
0.572 |
0.538 |
download these results as csv
Chroma Results Based on Onset Only[edit]
|
Precision |
Recall |
Ave. F-measure |
Ave. Overlap |
| BW2 |
0.622 |
0.491 |
0.546 |
0.555 |
| BW3 |
0.624 |
0.633 |
0.627 |
0.557 |
| CDM3 |
0.593 |
0.592 |
0.590 |
0.538 |
download these results as csv
Individual Results Files for Task 2[edit]
BW2= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
BW3= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
CDM3= Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch